Hurricane Katrina? Just blame George W.
You knew it was only a matter of time before someone figured out a tenuous link between the devastation in New Orleans — now considered the worst natural disaster to hit America since the great San Francisco fires — and President George W. Bush. According to a new piece by former Clinton advisor Sidney Blumenthal, “the damage wrought by the hurricane may not entirely be the result of an act of nature.”
“In 2001, FEMA warned that a hurricane striking New Orleans was one of the three most likely disasters in the U.S. But the Bush administration cut New Orleans flood control funding by 44 percent to pay for the Iraq war.”
“A year ago the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers proposed to study how New Orleans could be protected from a catastrophic hurricane, but the Bush administration ordered that the research not be undertaken … [they] cut funding requested by the New Orleans district of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for holding back the waters of Lake Pontchartrain by more than 80 percent … [their] policy of turning over wetlands to developers almost certainly also contributed to the heightened level of the storm surge.”
Today’s “Thank You For Pointing Out The Obvious” award goes to the New York Times. As Slate magazine points out, “The NYT seems to have a particularly strong faith in the oraclelike abilities of officialdom, announcing across the top on Page One: ‘BUSH SEES LONG RECOVERY FOR NEW ORLEANS.’ Does that tell us a damn thing?”
In a stirring op-ed this morning, the now web-only Times-Picayune called for a massive show of law enforcement in New Orleans, saying “lawlessness was intensifying to horrific levels,” while “the lack of a law enforcement presence is stunning.”










