The three stories were not connected, but they were deeply related. In the first, the Boston Globe reported that Bostonians are uneasy about the sight of 125-foot sailboat masts dominating the Huntington Avenue lawn in front of the Museum of Fine Arts as part of its latest ego-exhibit “Things I Love: The Many Collections of William I. Koch.” One passerby looked up at the soaring sailboats and told the paper, “They’re beautiful, but I’m still trying to figure out why they’re at the museum.”
In the second piece, a columnist for theToronto Star said we’ve got it all wrong: “We persist in the belief that beauty is the exclusive domain of the rich and powerful and the institutional. We go to museums and art galleries to search for beauty, and all the while, it can be seen at every turn … [we] have to learn to look closer, to trust our eyes more, not wait to be told what’s beautiful and what’s not.”
In the third, Heather Mallick wrote that “the distinction between ‘high’ art and ‘low’ art is so maddening that it makes people’s hair bleed. You cannot win … The snobbishness of the art world makes it almost impossible for a sane person, educated or not, to enjoy painting, music and books openly. The art world despises the arts of the masses — makeup, fashion, etc. and what Prof. Carey says is arguably the greatest art we practise, gardening — and yet museums are begging for tax money from the masses. They cannot bring themselves to find a middle ground.”
I think Malcolm Rogers, the controversial head of the MFA, despite all his flaws (and there are many, if you believe the op-ed page of the Globe), probably has the right perspective on the matter: ”Is the whole of museum culture going to come crashing down as a result of this? Give me a break. One of the things I want to do is humanize the arts.”